Kenneth Avila, Esq. - Patents, Trademarks, and Business Law
  • Home
  • Meet the Lawyer
  • Practice Areas
    • Business Law
    • Intellectual Property Law >
      • Patent FAQ and Fees
      • Trademark FAQ and Fees
      • Copyright FAQ and Fees
  • Resources
    • Blog
    • IP Twitter Feeds
    • IP Websites
  • Contact Me
  • Disclaimer
Inland Empire - (909) 566-2801
Santa Barbara - (805) 500-6241
Tennessee - (423) 226-8036
​Georgia - (404) 436-0899

Defamation.  Does it happen in the business world?

11/4/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture
We all know what defamation is.  Often it is in the news when one celebrity claims that another celebrity said something false about them.  One of the better known cases is between Bill Cosby and a number of women over allegations of rape.  Defamation has lots to do with hurting someone's reputation and although we are most acquainted with cases between two people it can also happen between two businesses.  If a first business damages the reputation of a second business then the second business may have a cause of action against the first business.  The cause of action is not called Defamation but "Trade Libel".

Trade Libel has a few cousins that in some ways overlap.  They are:

  1. Intentional Interference with Prospective Economic Advantage:  Used when the defendant intentionally disrupts or diverts the business relationship of another by improper methods which fall outside the boundaries of fair competition.
  2. Negligent Interference with Prospective Economic Advantage:  Similar to the above but is not done intentionally.  Rather the defendant acts unreasonably and wrongfully.
  3. Unfair Competition:  Here the California Business and Professions Code §17200 prohibits any "unlawful, unfair, or fraudulent business act or practice" and any "unfair, deceptive, untrue or misleading advertising".

If you would like to have me post a blog on one of the above let me know but for now lets discuss Trade Libel. 

Trade Libel occurs through the publication of a false statement that intentionally disparages the quality of property and induces another not to deal with the plaintiff, which causes the plaintiff actual pecuniary damage.  Key cases in California courts include Polygram Records, Inc. v. Superior Court, Nichols v. Great American Insurance Companies, and Erlich v. Etner.

To give rise to a cause of action for Trade Libel the plaintiff must prove the following elements:

  • A False Statement:  Whatever was said or written by the defendant was false.  To be actionable the statement by the has to be an assertion, not an opinion (Hofmannn Co. v. E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co.)
  • The Statement was Disparaging:  This may seem a bit obvious but clearly the defendant's statement must disparage the plaintiff (Nichols v. Great American Insurance Companies).
  • The Statement was Published:  The defendant must have communicated the disparaging statement orally or in writing (Guess, Inc. v. Superior Court).
  • The Statement Induces Others not to Deal with the Plaintiff:  The plaintiff must show that defendant's statement played a material and substantial part in inducing others not to deal with him.
  • The Inducement causes Plaintiff Harm:  The inducement must be shown to have caused harm to the plaintiff.  The plaintiff cannot just show a general decline in his business.  Plaintiff must identify transactions and customers lost as a result of the inducement.

Defendant also has defenses that they may present in court to defeat a claim of Trade Libel by the plaintiff.  These defenses include Statute of Limitations, Absolute Privilege, Qualified Statutory Privilege, and Constitutional Privileges.

As you can see, the plaintiff has their work cut out for them to prove that the defendant is liable for Trade Libel.  In particular the element of proving the harm that was caused by defendant's inducement.  However an "ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure" so be careful with statements that you make.  Check your facts and dot your i's and cross your t's when making a disparaging statement about another business or just not make such statements at all.

This blog posting is just a brief introduction into Trade Libel.  I recommend that you consult an attorney whenever:

  1. You have been accused of making a disparaging statement;
  2. You have received a disparaging statement; or
  3. You plan on making a disparaging statement.

A qualified attorney can help you with determining your legal risks and minimizing them.

0 Comments

    Categories

    All
    Agreements
    Arbitrary Trademarks
    Artificial Intelligence
    Business
    China
    Common-Law Rights
    Contracts
    Conversion
    Copyrights
    Corporations
    Counterfeit
    Counterfeiters
    Courses
    Defamation
    Descriptive Trademarks
    Design Patents
    Employee
    Employer
    Excusable Nonuse
    Fanciful Trademarks
    Federal Rights
    Foreign Filing
    FTC
    Generic Trademarks
    Hashtags
    Incontestable Trademark
    Independent Contractors
    Infringement Searches
    Injunction
    INTA
    Intellectual Property
    Invention Promotion Firms
    Inventors
    Latches
    License
    License Agreements
    LLC
    OECD
    Patentability Searches
    Patents
    Patent Searching
    Plant Patents
    Principle Register
    Roundtable
    Scams
    Software
    State Rights
    Suggestive Trademarks
    Supplemental Register
    Trade Libel
    Trademarks
    Trade Secrets
    UCC
    Unclean Hands
    Unfair Competition
    USA
    USPTO
    Utility Patents
    Videos
    Website
    WIPO

Picture

Copyright © 2011 - 2022 by Making Innovation Count PLLC. Notice: The information presented on this website is for general informational purposes only, and should not be relied upon as legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is created between you and Making Innovation Count PLLC simply by your use of this website.
  Redlands: 1255 West Colton Ave., CA 92374 
​Ontario:  3281 E Guasti Rd., CA 91761
Tennessee:  
651 E. 4th Street, TN 37403
Georgia:  260 Peachtree Street North West, Atlanta
Santa Barbara: 351 Paseo Nuevo, CA 93101


Note that these offices are virtual and only for the purpose of meeting with client who have previously made an appointment.
  • Home
  • Meet the Lawyer
  • Practice Areas
    • Business Law
    • Intellectual Property Law >
      • Patent FAQ and Fees
      • Trademark FAQ and Fees
      • Copyright FAQ and Fees
  • Resources
    • Blog
    • IP Twitter Feeds
    • IP Websites
  • Contact Me
  • Disclaimer