Kenneth Avila, Esq. - Patents, Trademarks, and Business Law
  • Home
  • Meet the Lawyer
  • Practice Areas
    • Business Law
    • Intellectual Property Law >
      • Patent FAQ and Fees
      • Trademark FAQ and Fees
      • Copyright FAQ and Fees
  • Resources
    • Blog
    • IP Twitter Feeds
    • IP Websites
  • Contact Me
  • Disclaimer
California - (909) 566-2801
(805) 979-2799
Tennessee - (423) 226-8036

Asked and Answered:  Going into business with a friend?  Don't be an idiot, get advice from an attorney and an agreement in writing.  This question gets replayed time and time again.  Do you want to be next?

12/28/2011

0 Comments

 
Question:  If my husband has the business license under his name but the ex-business partner has the fictitious business name under his name, who is liable if sued?

Facts:  My husband started a business and needed some backing so he had a ” friend” partner with him for the backing. They transferred the fictitious name to his ”friends” but never the business license. That remains under my husbands name. And now the ” friend” doesn't find the business important enough to pour into so had stopped paying on the services to supply the clients who have already paid. Therefore, they are unable to use the service. So my question is who is liable if sued?

Answer:  There are a few different issues in your facts, three of them are important.  There are two contracts and we have to ask if they are valid and enforceable.  If the contracts are valid then the non breaching party can seek a remedy from the breaching party.  The other issue is the type of business that was formed here between your husband and his friend.  The type of business formed will determine the limits of liability.  First let us look at the type of business that was formed.

Business Formation

There are two types of business models that may be supported by the facts – partnership and LLC (Limited Liability Company).  A LLC must be registered by the state and must follow certain rules and pay certain fees mandated by the state you are in.  A partnership has no such requirement.  However LLC, as the name implies, has an important advantage over partnership in that liability is limited.  In a partnership liability is unlimited.  If the business were an LLC then the client must limit their recovery to the assets of the business itself.  However it seems from the facts that the business in question was a partnership.  If the contract between the clients and the business are valid and the contract is breached the clients may seek recovery from both business and personal assets in order to recover their losses.  So assuming the business is a partnership then at this point in the analysis both your husband, and his friend’s, business and personal assets are at risk.

Contracts

There are two contracts in your facts.  The first contract is between the clients and the business.  If the business breaches the contracts then the clients may seek recovery from the business.  If the business is a partnership then the clients may seek recovery from the personal assets of the partners themselves.  From the facts it seems that both your husband and his friend have an ownership interest in the business.  Therefore the clients may seek to recover their losses first from the business.  If that does not satisfy their losses then they may seek recovery the personal assets of your husband, or his friend, or both.

Up to this point things are not going well for you but the second contract may offer some hope.  The second contract is between your husband and his friend.  The agreement was that the friend would provide money to the business and in return your husband would give his friend an ownership interest.  If your husband held up his side of the bargain then so must his friend, otherwise his friend has breached the contract/agreement.  If the friend now refuses to provide the money that was agreed to then your husband may sue his friend to enforce the agreement.  That may provide the funds necessary so that the first contract is not breached.

Fictitious Business Name

Finally let me deal with the license/fictitious name issue.  It does not matter who has the license or name.  You have to look at who has the authority to make contracts with the client.  We call this agency law.  It seems from the facts that both your husband and his friend had the actual authority to enter into contracts with clients.  That is all that matters here.  
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Agreements
    Arbitrary Trademarks
    Artificial Intelligence
    Business
    China
    Common-Law Rights
    Contracts
    Conversion
    Copyrights
    Corporations
    Counterfeit
    Counterfeiters
    Courses
    Defamation
    Descriptive Trademarks
    Design Patents
    Employee
    Employer
    Excusable Nonuse
    Fanciful Trademarks
    Federal Rights
    Foreign Filing
    FTC
    Generic Trademarks
    Hashtags
    Incontestable Trademark
    Independent Contractors
    Infringement Searches
    Injunction
    INTA
    Intellectual Property
    Invention Promotion Firms
    Inventors
    Latches
    License
    License Agreements
    LLC
    OECD
    Patentability Searches
    Patents
    Patent Searching
    Plant Patents
    Principle Register
    Roundtable
    Scams
    Software
    State Rights
    Suggestive Trademarks
    Supplemental Register
    Trade Libel
    Trademarks
    Trade Secrets
    UCC
    Unclean Hands
    Unfair Competition
    USA
    USPTO
    Utility Patents
    Videos
    Website
    WIPO

Picture

Copyright © 2011 - 2021 by Making Innovation Count PLLC. Notice: The information presented on this website is for general informational purposes only, and should not be relied upon as legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is created between you and Kenneth Avila Esq. simply by your use of this website.
  Redlands: 1255 West Colton Ave., CA 92374 
​Ontario:  3281 E Guasti Rd., CA 91761
Chattanooga:  
651 E. 4th Street, TN 37403
Santa Barbara
: 351 Paseo Nuevo, CA 93101

Note that these offices are virtual and only for the purpose of meeting with client who have previously made an appointment.
  • Home
  • Meet the Lawyer
  • Practice Areas
    • Business Law
    • Intellectual Property Law >
      • Patent FAQ and Fees
      • Trademark FAQ and Fees
      • Copyright FAQ and Fees
  • Resources
    • Blog
    • IP Twitter Feeds
    • IP Websites
  • Contact Me
  • Disclaimer