Kenneth Avila, Esq. - Patents, Trademarks, and Business Law
  • Home
  • Meet the Lawyer
  • Practice Areas
    • Business Law
    • Intellectual Property Law >
      • Patent FAQ and Fees
      • Trademark FAQ and Fees
      • Copyright FAQ and Fees
  • Resources
    • Blog
    • IP Twitter Feeds
    • IP Websites
  • Contact Me
  • Disclaimer
Inland Empire - (909) 566-2801
Santa Barbara - (805) 500-6241
Tennessee - (423) 226-8036
​Georgia - (404) 436-0899

How "Incontestable" is an Incontestable Trademark?

9/23/2017

1 Comment

 
Picture
Last week I posted in my blog an article that talked about the different levels of trademark protection one may obtain here in the United States.  The levels of trademark protection, from lowest to highest were:
  1. Common law (unregistered trademarks)​
  2. State registered trademarks
  3. Trademarks registered in the federal supplemental register
  4. Trademarks registered in the federal principle register
  5. Trademarks registered in the federal principle register with incontestable status.

​​In this article I will be taking a closer look at highest level of protection -- that of a trademark registered in the federal principle register with incontestability status.

First I want to make it clear that just because your trademark is incontestable doesn’t mean it cannot be contested.  Like so many other areas of the law there are exceptions.  So the word “incontestable” is actually somewhat of a misnomer and there are a number of grounds where an incontestable trademark may be attacked.  But before we get into that let us look at the benefits provided by incontestability that are above and beyond what is provided by registration on the principle register. 
  • The owner of the trademark needs to file for incontestability only once in the life of the trademark.  There is no need to renew the trademark’s incontestability status.
  • Rather inexpensive with government fees at $200 to $300 per class.
  • The trademark is immune to challenges based on descriptiveness such as (i) the trademark merely describes the goods or services, (ii) the trademark is primarily merely a surname, and (iii) the trademark is a geographic place name that will immediately convey a goods-place or services-place association in the minds of consumers.  This immunity applies both to challenges filed in the administrative courts at the trademark office as well as in federal court.
  • Potential infringers, upon seeing that your mark is incontestable, are more likely to respond favorably to a cease and desist letter.  This may be quite beneficial in reducing potential legal fees.

However, incontestability does not shield your trademark from the following kinds of attacks that all trademarks are susceptible to:
  1. Genericness;
  2. Functionality;
  3. Abandonment;
  4. Fraud on the trademark office;
  5. Immorality, deception, or scandalousness;
  6. Disparagement;
  7. False suggestion of a connection;
  8. Geographical indications on wines or spirits meeting certain requirements;
  9. Representation of a flag or coat of arms of any nation; or
  10. Representation or name of a living person without his or her consent or of a deceased president without the consent of his widow.

Some would argue that incontestability does not provide much of an advantage over a trademark that is registered on the principle register.  However I have found that telling a potential infringer that your mark is incontestable provides quite a punch to your cease and desist letter and encouraging the potential infringer to come to terms.

To claim incontestability status for your trademark you must prove that:
  • Your trademark has been in continuous use for at least five consecutive years from the date of registration;
  • Your trademark is currently being used in commerce;
  • Your trademark has been registered on the principle register;
  • There has been no final decision adverse to your claim of ownership or right to register the trademark;
  • There is no proceeding adverse to your claim of ownership or right to register the trademark that is pending;
  • It is within one year of any five-year period of continuous and consecutive use subsequent to the date of registration; and
  • The mark has not become generic. 

1 Comment
Free Sex in Indiana link
12/27/2022 10:21:31 am

Looved reading this thanks

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Agreements
    Arbitrary Trademarks
    Artificial Intelligence
    Business
    China
    Common-Law Rights
    Contracts
    Conversion
    Copyrights
    Corporations
    Counterfeit
    Counterfeiters
    Courses
    Defamation
    Descriptive Trademarks
    Design Patents
    Employee
    Employer
    Excusable Nonuse
    Fanciful Trademarks
    Federal Rights
    Foreign Filing
    FTC
    Generic Trademarks
    Hashtags
    Incontestable Trademark
    Independent Contractors
    Infringement Searches
    Injunction
    INTA
    Intellectual Property
    Invention Promotion Firms
    Inventors
    Latches
    License
    License Agreements
    LLC
    OECD
    Patentability Searches
    Patents
    Patent Searching
    Plant Patents
    Principle Register
    Roundtable
    Scams
    Software
    State Rights
    Suggestive Trademarks
    Supplemental Register
    Trade Libel
    Trademarks
    Trade Secrets
    UCC
    Unclean Hands
    Unfair Competition
    USA
    USPTO
    Utility Patents
    Videos
    Website
    WIPO

Picture

Copyright © 2011 - 2022 by Making Innovation Count PLLC. Notice: The information presented on this website is for general informational purposes only, and should not be relied upon as legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is created between you and Making Innovation Count PLLC simply by your use of this website.
  Redlands: 1255 West Colton Ave., CA 92374 
​Ontario:  3281 E Guasti Rd., CA 91761
Tennessee:  
651 E. 4th Street, TN 37403
Georgia:  260 Peachtree Street North West, Atlanta
Santa Barbara: 351 Paseo Nuevo, CA 93101


Note that these offices are virtual and only for the purpose of meeting with client who have previously made an appointment.
  • Home
  • Meet the Lawyer
  • Practice Areas
    • Business Law
    • Intellectual Property Law >
      • Patent FAQ and Fees
      • Trademark FAQ and Fees
      • Copyright FAQ and Fees
  • Resources
    • Blog
    • IP Twitter Feeds
    • IP Websites
  • Contact Me
  • Disclaimer